Panelists:
€ Moderator: Jane Fountain, John F. Kennedy School
of Government, Harvard University, jane_fountain@harvard.edu
€ Noshir S. Contractor, Departments of Speech Communication
and Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
€ Dave Kirk, Dean, Digital Academy, Department of
Information Services, Washington State
€ David Lazer, John F. Kennedy School of Government,
Harvard University
€ Juliet Musso, School of Policy, Planning, and
Development, University of Southern California
€ Nicole Steckler, Department of Management in Science
and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University
The central goal of this panel was advancement of deeper, broader social
and applied social science research capacity in the domain of digital
government. Our focus was on the relationship between information technologies
and government organizations, institutions, and networks, that is, the
structure, processes and operations of government. The session drew from
the social and applied science disciplines and fields that focus on organizations,
institutions, networks, public management and administration.
The panelists focused on the following types of questions:
€ What are the most important impacts of information technologies
on the structure and processes of government organizations? Which impacts
are already discernible? Which are likely to emerge during the next decade?
€ Reversing the causal arrow, how are public managers and policymakers
using information technologies to craft new organizational forms or to
make important modifications to present forms? What decision making and
problem-solving processes are emerging as the principal means of mutual
adjustment?
€ What is the impact of increasing use of information-based, networked
forms of organization on the institutional structures‹for example,
oversight, budgeting, accountability systems‹that regulate governance?
€ What perspectives, theories, conceptual frameworks, and methods
seem particularly useful for the study of the developmental processes
and organization of digital government?
€ What forms and processes of collaboration between social, policy,
and information scientists might further a research agenda for digital
government? How might an organization like the National Science Foundation
Digital Government Program provide incentives for the advancement of high-quality
multidisciplinary |